Ideas
Count
.....by Gerald Frendt
Ideas count, and ideas often come with names.
In the most recent facet of the Presidential “Dust Up”, the
Republican ticket has followed Joe, the Plumber, in suggesting that Senator
Barack Obama “sounds like a Socialist”.
Media pundits across the political spectrum condemn the suggestion as
nothing more than desperate name calling. Fred
Barnes, Executive Editor of the “Weekly Standard”, and a conservative Fox
News contributor, scoffs that “socialism is when the government owns the means
of production, in the economy”, that merely wanting to “spread the wealth”
does not qualify one as a socialist. With
his recent support of the Wall Street bailout, and the subsequent
“nationalization” of major banks, it is easy to understand his sensitivity
on the subject. Many Republicans
feel shame that it was our party that introduced these intrusive market
measures. Social engineering of our
mortgage market led to the creation of worthless mortgage securities, the
perceived willingness to guarantee those securities led to world wide
speculation. The speculators were
proven right – when social programs go bad, they are always fixed with more
social programs. Politicians never
admit failure.
Karl Marx, history’s most famous socialist, favored government ownership
of the means of production. He is
most closely associated with the phrase, “from each according to his ability,
to each according to his need”. Sound
familiar? Senator Bernie Sanders, of
Vermont
, is the only member of Congress to identify himself proudly, as a democratic
socialist. He is rated the fourth
most liberal member of the Senate, while Senators Obama and Biden are number one
and three, respectively. I wonder if Senator Sanders would find them socialist
leaning?
So, what’s the problem with being identified as a socialist?
Marketing. As “informed”
Americans, we remember that the
USSR
, stood for The
Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics
, and we wouldn’t want to be like that. We were taught that socialist
societies, lose their individual freedoms, and we wouldn’t like that. We
associate Socialism, with Communism, and Communism with godlessness, and we
wouldn’t tolerate that. Election
marketers know the attention span of the American public is about thirty
seconds, so when their candidate is identified as a
“socialist”, they aggressively resist
the negative associations that come with that name.
Anyone willing to spend more than thirty seconds, would know that we have
steadily moved from a Capitalist, free market society to a more socialistic and
regulated society. From the inception of the progressive income tax, Social
Security, Medicare, food stamps, welfare, in its many forms, national funding
and control of our schools, subsidized and controlled agriculture, the list goes
on…we have continued to let government take a bigger and bigger role in our
lives. Next, most likely, will be health care, control of free speech, through
the “fairness doctrine”, regulation and rationing of our energy needs, and
controls to “save the planet”. We
will even extend all these social benefits to those that illegally invade our
borders. But we will not tolerate
socialism.
In this election year, it took Joe, the plumber, to state the
obvious…“the Emporer has no clothes”.
He has been the recipient of wrath and scorn from politicians and the
media in its highest degree. His
credentials have been trashed… “his name is Sam, not Joe”,… “he
doesn’t have a plumbers license”,….“he owes back taxes”…
When
Michigan’s electoral votes were still being contested, many unashamed
Capitalists, who normally vote Republican, were resigned to holding our nose
while in the booth. We didn’t find
Senator McCain a consistent defender of our beliefs. Then came Governor Sarah
Palin, a defender of Joe, the Plumber, as well as our belief in free market
Capitalism. Similar to Joe, she is a
recipient of unrelenting scorn and ridicule.
Compared to the three Senators, running for national office, she has more
executive experience, but more importantly, she radiates and communicates a
genuine trustworthiness to the average American worker and family.
She comes to this challenge with an internal instinct that will guide her
to make good on her oath of office – “to defend the Constitution” and in
doing so, she will defend our American values.
In the primary season, all of the Republican candidates failed in their
attempt to identify themselves as the next Reagan.
Like Cinderella’s ugly sisters, they tried, unsuccessfully, to squeeze
into his shoes. But with Sarah Palin,
the shoe fits.
In 1964, Ronald Reagan made his national political debut by giving his
famous speech on behalf of Barry Goldwater.
The country wasn’t ready for his message and the Republican Party was
dealt the worst defeat since 1936. Conservatives
picked up the pieces and two years later they regained 47 house seats.
The Republican Party was rebuilt and would be dominated by the Reagan
movement over the next 24 years. The Bush Presidencies returned the party to
pre-Reagan form. Ronald Reagan would
not have bailed out Wall Street, nor would he have nationalized the banks.
Our party is corrupted and damaged. Hopefully,
history will be kind, and if we are to suffer defeat, maybe we can find some
solace in having identified a new party standard bearer that will help us pick
up the pieces.