| 2009 City Council Election Home Page | ||||||
| The Port Huron Times Herald recently published a candidate forum for those seeking election to the City Council. The responses are posted below. As an effort to continue the discussion of issues facing our city, Local-Opinion.com has offered to sponsor a forum in which the candidates, themselves, ask questions on matters they feel deserve the attention of the electorate. Each candidate was sent an invitation (home page), to participate. | ||||||
|
Click on each candidates name for short bio and full answers to all questions. |
||||||
| Sherry Archibald | Mark Byrne | Marty Doorn | James Fisher | Ken Harris | Alan Lewandowski | Irene Michaels |
| Steven Miller | Brian Moeller | Mark Neal | Chad Noetzel | Edison Palmer | Pauline Repp | Domingo Ruiz |
|
Unique
Visitors To This Page |
||||||
| "Will the new council promote boating for Port Huron like keeping the Black River Canal finally dredged out or allowing alcohol consumption on the south side of Black River downtown." Submitted by Rick Niemietz, seconded by Chad Noetzel 10-27-09. | ||||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
"I believe we need to do everything we can to further promote our waterfront and boating. The boating population in Port Huron and the potential visiting boaters is a huge market. If we concentrate our efforts on expanding the boating activities and the boating experience we can attract even more boaters to our beautiful waters and city. Though I am currently unaware of the cost of dredging the canal I certainly support the logic of doing all we can to enhance boating in our community and would support whatever can be done to accomplish this. As for alcohol consumption on the south side of Black River downtown I believe there should be no differential between the north side or the south side of Black River and the rules/regulations of alcohol consumption should be the same for both." | |||||
| Mark Byrne |
"I
don't think I can ad much to Chads's answer. I agree 100% with Chad on
this question.
I will expand on the question though. We have beaches that are rockier
than most tourist like. For those with out boats we have to walk on all
those rocks to get to the sand bar and enjoy lake Huron. I support
getting DNR permission if needed and then start picking up the rocks. A
20 foot wide path with out rocks down the beach into the water and
through the water to the sand bar would be a start. Over time the area
cleared could grow. Yes new rocks would get washed back. |
|||||
| Marty Doorn | ||||||
| James Fisher | ||||||
| Ken Harris | ||||||
| Alan Lewandowski | ||||||
| Irene Michaels | ||||||
| Steven Miller | ||||||
| Brian Moeller | ||||||
| Mark Neal | ||||||
| Chad Noetzel |
'Yes we should allow drinking on the south side of Black River. The problem is that most of the property is private on that side east of Military St Bridge. As far as the canal. That is a little more complicated. That canal was not designed to be navigable. It was to help flush out Black River. The time the DEQ will allow to dredge is a very short window. But I would like to at least try to keep it dredged until a permanent solution is found. I believe there have been studies in the past and it was too expensive to make that a navigable waterway with a guaranteed depth. The amount of sand that gets moved in a storm is a big factor. The Coast Guard Station has to be dredge 2-3 times a year. And There are boulders the size of trucks that get moved around like pebbles. I have also noticed that the banks are starting to slide in. More rip rap is sliding into the canal. I believe the slope is too steep to allow for a slow runoff of rain water. The more gradual the slope the slower the water will run down the banks. And last but not least. I believe there are a few landowners that are against any development. One in particular! The best way would be to get a boat launch somewhere on the lake. We all know how dangerous the St Clair River can get in a south wind or heavy traffic. 20 miles between launches is too much for this area. Metcalf Rd or Harris Rd would be better. But expensive! If elected boating will be promoted heavily. The Water St Marina needs to be open. There are going to be boats leaving when they start tearing up the Black River overpass. We need those people here for the summer. There are quite a few businesses that depend on them during the boating season. We are called The Maritime Capital of the Great Lakes. And we need to prove it." |
|||||
| Edison Palmer | ||||||
| Pauline Repp | ||||||
| Domingo Ruiz | ||||||
| "Do you favor a ‘Ward System’ or ‘At Large System’ for our city, and why?” Submitted by Mike McCarthy seconded by Chad Noetzel 10-19-09. | ||||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
"I remain firm in my believe that every council member should be concerned with and represent every resident of the city. Some say that a ward system will unit the city as it will allow each to feel they have a voice and a specific individual to go to with concerns, others including myself remained concerned that the division between North and South will be expanded to divisions between neighborhoods within the north or south. I have from the beginning voiced these concerns but have also stated that I would be supportive of a hybrid system that would combine the two with a greater number of seats being selected through the ward system and the remainder selected at large. I have listened to the residents who believe this system would provide better representation and would support it. I have not changed my position on this issue". |
|||||
| Mark Byrne |
"I
like the ward system because as a Libertarian I firmly believe the more
local the decisions are made the better informed the decisions
are. I prefer Individual Rights over City authority, City Rights
over County authority, County Rights over States authority and States
Rights over Federal power. An
examples is that the Charter commission can change the date city
property taxes are do from June 1st to December 1st. Short term this would
provide those with escrow accounts a one time economic boost to
help get through this tough economy in the form of a escrow account
refund for the balance being too high. Long term it will keep more
money in the local economy and make Port Huron a smarter choice by
allowing those who pay property taxes directly to pay before December 31st
every other year giving them a larger itemized deduction on the Federal
tax return one year and lower their itemized deductions the following
year so that the standard deduction will be a larger deduction the
next year. This creates a larger 2 year total deductions on Federal
taxes which means more money will stay in Port Huron instead of going to
Washington DC. The Charter commission has chosen not to do this
after I presented it them. An
example on the other hand is that electing the mayor separately
instead of allowing the elected council to select their leader. This
will cost more as primaries for Mayor will be more common than primaries
for city council have been. This might be worth the extra cost if
the Mayor had any additional powers that the other council members do
not such as veto power. With the Mayor just being another
council member except for ceremonial purposes it makes no sense to spend
more money to elect the Mayor separate. The current system of
allowing the council to select the Mayor insures that a responsible
council will elect the person who will be in the majority of most
decisions the council makes. Electing the Mayor separately or
automatically making the highest vote getter the mayor will occasional
lead to Mayor who is in conflict with the majority of council
members. What is the point of electing a Mayor separately and
not giving them extra authority? The only result will be a frustrated
Mayor who gets out voted on everything when the majority of
council is not in agreement with that mayor most of the time.
I
am also opposed to staggered terms. Many voters wanted the old council out
for choosing to dramatically raise water and sewer rates rather than find budget
cuts. Staggered terms would have prevented the voters from being able
to change that direction after only 1 year. Those same voters
took a chance on some unknown candidates like me and might want to make a
change now not two more years from now. |
|||||
| Marty Doorn | ||||||
| James Fisher |
"I
strongly favor a ward system for Port Huron. For over 30 years our
current at-large system has left voters in areas of our city feeling
disenfranchised by city government and Council. Changing to ward
representation would be a bold stroke of leadership, but it appears that
the majority on this commission are not interested in inclusiveness,
boldness or leadership. The majority seem timid and wish to stay with the
status quo. From
Holland to Coldwater to Kentwood, Port Huron is the only community I have
ever lived where the total Council is elected “at large.” Midland and
Dowagiac, cities that Charter Commission Vice Chairman Carl Tomion worked
for, have ward systems. The economic and voting disparity between the
north and south sides of Port Huron nearly ensures that the south side
will be less represented. Just as California and Rhode Island elect
representatives to our federal government, so should Port Huron have wards
to insure fair and equal representation. Those
who support a total at-large system will cite "unity" or state a
belief that the at-large system "ensures" council members to
represent the entire city. Both arguments are flawed. First, elected by
ward or at-large, every council member would "represent the entire
city." Every member would have a say in all resolutions or proposals
put forth on the agenda. Second, it is obvious that sections of our
community feel under-represented or that their voice is ignored. You can
hear it in the impassioned appeals of Council candidate, Edison Palmer who
is trying to be sure his neighborhood is heard and represented. If the
at-large system was truly effective in representing the entire city, we
would not have a "South Side Coalition." I have yet to hear of a
"North Side Coalition" organization." |
|||||
| Ken Harris | ||||||
| Alan Lewandowski | ||||||
| Irene Michaels | ||||||
| Steven Miller | ||||||
| Brian Moeller | ||||||
| Mark Neal | ||||||
| Chad Noetzel |
"I'm in favor of a ward system. I think it would almost force citizens to pay a little more attention to who is running for office and will therefore vote. It would be a lot easier for candidates to get out and meet as many voters as possible and get their views on what are the major concerns to them. If people feel they are not going to have a say they will not vote at all. We as a city need to be more receptive to the needs of the city as a whole. What happens in the south end of Port Huron should matter to residents in the north end. My biggest concern is the apathy that is currently in some sections of town. That apathy is passed on to the young people in that area and it never ends. I want more people in Port Huron to vote. Regardless of how they vote. I think this would help start that." |
|||||
| Edison Palmer | ||||||
| Pauline Repp | ||||||
| Domingo Ruiz | ||||||
| "What is your opinion of Port Huron's city income tax? Submitted by Alice O'Neil, seconded by Chad Noetzel 10-2-09." | ||||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
"I believe one of the biggest issues hurting the city is the high cost of living and doing business in the city. The property tax is already higher than the surrounding townships and when the income tax is added in it certainly drives people to look outside the city limits for a home. I have spoken with several realtors who will all tell you that when showing homes within the city the high cost of owning a home here is the primary reason potential buyers look elsewhere. This is especially true for those who work outside the city. Residents who live in the city yet work outside the city come back to Port Huron at the end of the day bringing their income with them. They pay for their home, their property taxes, generally shop and eat in the city and still on top of that they are required to pay 1% of their income to the city. Income they could keep just by living in any of the surrounding townships. At the pre-primary debate I spoke of wanting to see the city eliminate the income tax. I realize that the city depends on this revenue and eliminating it especially during hard economic times will be difficult however, I firmly believe that the city would make up the revenue through other means and eliminating the city income tax would attract more homeowners into the city. Though I would be remiss to promise the elimination of the income tax during my two year term should I be elected, I will certainly be a strong advocate for eliminating it. One possible solution may be to begin phasing it out over time so the city isn’t faced with the loss of revenue all at once but over a period of time. We must also recognize that this must be one of many solutions all put into place as it is not the only issue facing the city and preventing people from looking here when considering relocating." | |||||
| Mark Byrne | Taxes
in |
|||||
| Marty Doorn | "No Response" | |||||
| James Fisher |
"While
I dislike the city's income tax, I believe the larger issue holding back
the city, is our property tax rate. It is vital that we find a way to
lower the property tax rates to bring us in line with the surrounding
cities and townships. As the Times Herald has reported, property taxes on
a $150,000 home are nearly $1000 more than in Fort Gratiot Township. That
translates to a higher house payment of about $80 per month. High tax
rates are stifling jobs and growth in our city. To achieve this goal, it
will take a consensus of effort between Council, city administration and
citizens of Port Huron. This will be difficult to accomplish, but the
rewards will be great. I
also believe this is the wrong time to look at eliminating the city income
tax. With the Blue Water Area Bridge expansion project, we are looking at
the creation of 7000 new jobs (MDOT estimate), most of which will be in
the city. Figuring just 5000 jobs at $30,000 average salary will mean a
$750,000 per year increase of income tax collection. The figure will more
likely be over $1 million dollars per year during the life of the project.
This will help to replace the loss of state revenue sharing funds, provide
more police and fire protection and give us the opportunity to keep water
and sewer rates from increasing." |
|||||
| Ken Harris | "No Response" | |||||
| Alan Lewandowski | "No Response" | |||||
| Irene Michaels | "No Response" | |||||
| Steven Miller | "No Response" | |||||
| Brian Moeller | "No Response" | |||||
| Mark Neal | "No Response" | |||||
| Chad Noetzel |
"It should have went down the sewer it was set up to pay for 40 years ago! I can't for the life of me figure out why we penalize our citizens to live and work in Port Huron. How do other cities survive without a city income tax. It creates a negative environment for commercial and residential progress. Just promising to not raise water rates is not enough anymore. The City income tax needs to go. If elected, reducing the city income tax to nothing will be my goal. And it can be done." |
|||||
| Edison Palmer | "No Response" | |||||
| Pauline Repp | "Any
way of lessening the burden for our taxpayers should be looked at; however, because
income tax revenues are a large part of the City's budget and are paid by
non-residents as well as residents, any decision to eliminate it would
need to be looked at very carefully." |
|||||
| Domingo Ruiz | "No Response" | |||||
| "Do you feel it is necessary for a councilperson to read the sales agreement, prior to voting, when the city is buying or selling real estate?" Submitted by Gerald Frendt seconded by Chad Noetzel 9-30-09. | ||||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
"No Response" | |||||
| Mark Byrne |
"My
answer is an easy Yes. Council members have a fiduciary
responsibility to ensure the taxpayers money is spent wisely and not
wasted.
I asked to delay this resolution and not having a purchase agreement was
one of the reasons I gave for that delay. I also voted no since I did not
have enough information to make a $660,000 decision on with the purchase
agreement not being there being one of them.
This topic was discussed by the Charter Commission at their last meeting
as the Charter requires the City Manager, Mayor and a Lawyer to sign off
on all contracts. It was an enlightening conversation.
As Real Estate transactions tend to be large and can carry hidden
liabilities such as the Fort Gratiot Light House agreement wanting
the city to take responsibility for all past asbestos exposures, I personally
want to see a real estate purchase agreement before I vote
to ok it. Since
a Mayor is required to sign all contracts they will get a chance to read
the actual purchase agreement along with hearing what the City
Manager and Lawyers think about it before signing it. If they see
something they do not like they can choose not to sign
it. I mention this as that points out that the Mayor still has one more
chance to vote and to them this was a preliminary step to keep the ball
rolling and get a purchase agreement done so that he can review it.
A No vote on Monday would have ended the project. Other
council members will not see the purchase agreement until after
is signed if it ends up being signed so this was our last chance to
object to anything in it so I needed to see it. Another
situation that I might vote in favor of a purchase before a purchase
agreement is available is when timing is critical and a 2 week delay might
cause an opportunity to be missed and I have known the other people
working on it long enough that I know they will do a thorough job and let
me know about anything that comes up that may change my mind. I treat tax money as if it was my money being spent, which part of it is my money." |
|||||
| Marty Doorn | "No Response" | |||||
| James Fisher | Yes | |||||
| Ken Harris | "No Response" | |||||
| Alan Lewandowski | "No Response" | |||||
| Irene Michaels | "No Response" | |||||
| Steven Miller | "No Response" | |||||
| Brian Moeller |
"Yes,
However
Chad I think the real question should be, should a council member always
vote the way his or her supporters want them to vote? Should
candidates always vote the way the Good O' Boys, Good O' Girls, or
the the want-a-bees or anyone else would want them to vote on every
issue. If so then they should run for council and vote the way they
think things should be. I for one have always voted the
way I though was right and the best for the citizens of Port
Huron. However I still believe we should all be adults and still
be able to agree to disagree and still support the people we think are
doing what they think is right and who we agree with most of the time. |
|||||
| Mark Neal | "No Response" | |||||
| Chad Noetzel | "It is the duty of any elected official to read every word of a proposal set before them. It is not their money they are spending. The first question they should ask themselves is,"if this was my money would I spend it like this".I know that the legalities may not be understood by every elected official. So a professional should explain it to them before they vote. The future ramifications should be explained in depth also. All to often decisions are made without looking ahead. It would be nice if elected officials could cast a vote without thinking of their own immediate political lives." | |||||
| Edison Palmer | "No Response" | |||||
| Pauline Repp | "Yes" | |||||
| Domingo Ruiz | "No Response" | |||||
| "In light of recent events I would like to know how each candidate feels about the City of Port Huron enacting an ordinance banning the ownership of dangerous breeds of dogs, specifically those commonly known as 'Pit Bulls'." Submitted by Bill Kessler, Port Huron, MI. Seconded by Edison Palmer 9-22-09. | ||||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
No Response | |||||
| Mark Byrne |
"Apparently this question is too hot to touch as you’re
bound to lose votes from either dog owners or from parents with small
children who do not have dogs. I will attempt to get the ball rolling as
this is a very legitimate question for communities.
I personally have a 5 year old at home without a fenced in yard and
have had an occasional stray dog wander into our backyard. The possibility
of a stray aggressive dog attacking my son is a reality.
I also know that some Pit Bulls are trained to be good and some are
trained to be mean. This is true of other breeds of dogs as well. I know a
child who was attacked by a German Sheppard and mauled badly.
Having cut grass for a landscaping company for many years I know
gentle dogs and aggressive dogs come in all shapes and sizes.
I am not in favor of an outright ban on all dogs nor a ban on just
some dogs. One reason is that
dogs are often used as security for some people. I know my neighbor’s
dogs will start barking if a stranger comes between our houses for
example. I do not think there are many who would argue that a German
Sheppard does not deter some crime.
I am very much in favor of prosecuting owners as if they committed
the assault themselves when their dog attacks someone who is not on their
property. If you going to have an aggressive dog, you are responsible to
contain or control it at all times. Your dog putting someone in the
hospital after getting out of your yard is your responsibility.
I am also in favor of bans with severe penalties for training dogs
to fight and penalties such as fines for not being able to contain and
control your dog. If your pit bull or other strong breed is wandering the
neighborhood by itself while you’re elsewhere then there should be a law
that penalizes you for allowing that to happen.
I know dogs occasional get out as I have helped more than one
person round up their dog after it gets out of the yard. If it only
happens once and it’s a gentle well trained dog I am sure you’ll have
it back in the yard quickly and safely without any neighbors getting
concerned. If it’s a dog trained to be aggressive then you should have
taken more precautions as many responsible dog owners do.
Dogs are not the issue as much as the bad owners who have more dog
than they can handle or purposely train the dog to be aggressive." |
|||||
| Marty Doorn | No Response | |||||
| James Fisher |
"I
would be more than willing to consider a city ban on Pit Bulls and other
dangerous breeds. Urban living is different than rural living. Just as we
have decided to enact noise ordinances to protect our citizens, we should
at least look at enacting an ordinance about violent dog breeds to protect
our citizens. It was noted in a report from the Centers of Disease Control
and Protection, "the data indicate that Rottweilers and pit bull-type
dogs accounted for 67% of human DBRF in the United States between 1997 and
1998. It is extremely unlikely that they accounted for anywhere near 60%
of dogs in the United States during that same period and, thus, there
appears to be a breed-specific problem with fatalities." Based on the
research I have done, I would support such a ban." |
|||||
| Ken Harris | No Response | |||||
| Alan Lewandowski | No Response | |||||
| Irene Michaels | No Response | |||||
| Steven Miller | No Response | |||||
| Brian Moeller |
"To be honest I could go either way at this point, but let me say, I am not sure it is the breed or if it is the dog. That is like saying certain people are bad just because there father or mother were criminals or the parents are back because their child turns out to be a criminal. Just isn't always so. So bottom line, I am not sure as to banding certain breeds. However, I do believe public safety must be the councils priority." |
|||||
| Mark Neal | No Response | |||||
| Chad Noetzel | No Response | |||||
| Edison Palmer | No Response | |||||
| Pauline Repp | No Response | |||||
| Domingo Ruiz | No Response | |||||
| "This
forum has been set up for the candidates to ask the questions. Do you feel
that the opportunity to ask questions should be offered to non-candidates
as well? |
||||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
"While I welcome the opportunity to answer questions from the residents of Port Huron I feel that decision is up to the person offering this interactive dialogue as he will be the one having to field the questions, post those he feels acceptable and also post all the candidates answers. I do believe it would be a great opportunity for residents to be able to pose questions to the candidates and compare their answers on the issues. Like the candidates, I feel residents should have to use their name when presenting a question." | |||||
| Mark Byrne | "I
am always willing to answer questions from anybody. I answer
questions on the Times Herald Forum called "Ask you local government
official" and will answer any e-mail or phone call I get.
e-Mail me at byrnem@porthuron.org
if you have a question. As to this forum allowing questions from non-candidates I will leave that entirely up to the owner of the site who has so graciously offered us all a Free way of getting our views out. If questions are allowed I would suggest that anonymous ones not be allowed as that as other blogs have shown anonymous bloggers can be very mean spirited and that is not in the interest of making this a site people will find useful for learning about the candidates. In addition that may provide an excuse for some candidates not to participate." |
|||||
| Marty Doorn | No Response | |||||
| James Fisher | "I submitted this because I would like to have questions from the voters. Putting the voters in charge of the questions would be more like a public debate or town hall. This will also give us questions posed to specific candidates as well as the whole field. Questions must not be asked by "anonymous," the inquisitors must be willing to give their name." | |||||
| Ken Harris | No Response | |||||
| Alan Lewandowski |
"I
do not have a problem of answering questions from whoever wants to ask
one. My phone number and email address are both posted on the city
website. |
|||||
| Irene Michaels | No Response | |||||
| Steven Miller | No Response | |||||
| Brian Moeller | "Yes" | |||||
| Mark Neal | No Response | |||||
| Chad Noetzel | "Yes that way I'm not the only one hanging myself on thetimes herald forum board" | |||||
| Edison Palmer | "I feel that if the person asking the question is a Port Huron Resident then I feel their question is relevant. As this is a Port Huron City Council race only resident questions should matter." | |||||
| Pauline Repp | No Response | |||||
| Domingo Ruiz | No Response | |||||
| "How do the candidates feel about having fundraisers outside of Port Huron city limits. Do they get most of their contributions from non residents or from residents? Also do they feel that township resident contributions can sway their opinions and how they vote?" Submitted by John Edison 9-11-09 | ||||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
"Many
of the council candidates have friends and family who would like to
support them in their campaign that are not residents of the City of Port
Huron. As non-residents, donations are one of the few ways they can show
their support. I do not see a problem with a candidate receiving donations
from non-residents. I do have a problem however with any candidate who
would let any donor (resident or not) sway their vote on any issue.
Council members are elected to vote on behalf of all residents of the city
not for individual personal agendas. In addition, I believe that the
growth and success of the surrounding townships, villages, and cities is
affected by the growth and success of the city itself and encourage all
non-residents to take a greater interest in Port Huron and its future.
Together we can all make Port Huron and the surrounding areas a greater
place to live. |
|||||
| Mark Byrne |
"I
would not hold a fund raiser outside of Decisions
made by the That
said it is important to know who the candidates are and not be voting for
candidates just because they have a lot of signs or nice literature or
other campaign material that donations allow them to buy. ...click
here for more on bio page |
|||||
| Marty Doorn | No Response | |||||
| James Fisher | This is an easy question to ask, or to answer in a grandstanding way, but the issue is very complex. What if a fundraiser is held outside the city, but all attendees are Port Huron residents? What if a fundraiser is held in Port Huron but all the contributions come from outside the city? I have no objection to where a city council candidate holds a fundraiser or event. City politics are different than national politics where contributions from foreign countries can undermine our sovereignty. I doubt that our surrounding communities and residents are hostile to Port Huron or trying to undermine our city. We often do that to ourselves without any outside help. | |||||
| Ken Harris | No Response | |||||
| Alan Lewandowski | "I
don’t feel that it is wrong for a candidate to hold a fundraiser outside
of Port Huron. In fact, I think it could end up being beneficial for the
city. If Port Huron is going to be economically viable in the future, the
city is going to need people from outside of the city to make capital
investments inside of Port Huron. Fundraisers are not used to only raise
campaign funds, but are also used to meet many different types of people
and promote the area in which you are seeking to be elected. Yes
I have raised campaign money from residents and non-residents. When I was
one of the Regional Directors of the Michigan Young Democrats, I had the
opportunity to meet people from all over the State of Michigan. I also was
born and raised in Port Huron and many of my friends and relatives live in
Port Huron and the surrounding areas. I
don’t feel that accepting campaign contributions from anyone sways how I
vote. Those that have contributed to my campaign understand that I always
vote to do what is best, in my own opinion, for the city and its
residents. I think people understand that running a serious campaign cost
money and involves a large time commitment. I truly believe that people
have donated to my campaign because they saw a person who was out working
hard, making level headed decisions, and who they thought was doing what
is right for our city." |
|||||
| Irene Michaels | No Response | |||||
| Steven Miller | No Response | |||||
| Brian Moeller |
"Last
time I only took money from relatives and friends. My wife and
I spent approximately $465 of our own money. This year I have
received money from people both who live in the city and outside the city
who have an interest in the city. I have not had a fund raiser, but
I don't have a problem with it as long as it is within the law." |
|||||
| Mark Neal | No Response | |||||
| Chad Noetzel | "I for one will not be asking anyone for money for my campaign. People have contacted me wanting to support me by buying their own signs. I do not want to give the impression that I am in someone's pocket. If elected my decisions will be made by me and not influenced by the amount of money I received from a donor. I am flying solo on this one." | |||||
| Edison Palmer |
"I personally feel that fundraisers outside of city limits are wrong. If a candidate cannot draw city residents to support them, then maybe that should say something about their campaign, that their platform fits township residents interests and not Port Huron resident interests. I personally have felt that meeting PORT HURON RESIDENTS face to face and finding out what is important to them and showing how my platform of City Residents First will help our city. Also, I will not take support from special interest groups such as Unions (like some incumbant candidate) or Big Players in the EDA (some challengers). I feel that the regular working class family and our seniors on fixed income are my voters and prioity, not special interest groups" |
|||||
| Pauline Repp | No Response | |||||
| Domingo Ruiz | No Response | |||||
|
"How
do you like the work new city manager Bruce Brown is doing ? Please give
examples of what you liked or disliked so far." |
||||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
No Response | |||||
| Mark Byrne | While
I submitted this question I will also answer it.
I think Bruce is doing an excellent job. His strengths such as
communication and team building are even better than I thought they would
be. I knew he had great experience and success in development and am very
pleased with how hard Bruce is working to get things started in |
|||||
| Marty Doorn | "Bruce has proved to be transparent, cooperative and competent. He has provided stable leadership in very challenging times." | |||||
| James Fisher | I
have enjoyed working with Bruce immensely. His calm demeanor, vast
experience and communication skills are exactly what Port Huron needs. One
small example of his ability to get things done would be the "Rockin'
The Rivers" concert series. For years various groups and individuals
have tried to get music played on our river. Bruce saw an opportunity,
seized it and made it happen. A simple plan executed extremely well. |
|||||
| Ken Harris | No Response | |||||
| Alan Lewandowski |
"I
think that Bruce Brown has done a wonderful job in his short time as Port
Huron’s City Manager. He has brought many well thought out and creative
ideas for the betterment of Port Huron to the councils attention. Bruce
Brown has the ability to adapt to any situation which he may face with the
city and brings a wealth of knowledge with him from his past experiences. What
I like best about Bruce Brown is his leadership skills. He arrived in the
city at a rocky point in its history and has been able to get the majority
of people on board with his and councils vision for the future of Port
Huron." |
|||||
| Irene Michaels | No Response | |||||
| Steven Miller | No Response | |||||
| Brian Moeller | "First let me say as a first time council person, I don't have much to compare with like Mayor Pro Tem Fisher, but let me say he is a breath of fresh air compared to what we had and may have again if the wrong people are elected. With that said let me say I like his openness and his communication with the City Council. I like his ideas as an outsider. He hasn't been taken over by the Good O' Boys and isn't afraid to suggest ideas outside of the box. He understands his role and I think he does a good job doing it." | |||||
| Mark Neal | No Response | |||||
| Chad Noetzel | No Response | |||||
| Edison Palmer | No Response | |||||
| Pauline Repp | No Response | |||||
| Domingo Ruiz | No Response | |||||
| "A few months ago the City Council removed funding for the EDA and hired their own Economic Development director. Do you support the direction this council has taken?" Submitted by John Edison Palmer 8-27-2009. | ||||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
"I
am a strong believer that “viable” partnerships are essential to the
future of the city. Unfortunately I do not believe I, nor the residents of
Port Huron, have all the “inside” information necessary to determine
if the partnership with the EDA was a “viable” partnership that was
good for both the City of Port Huron and the EDA or a partnership that was
no longer “viable”. While I strongly support the city’s initiative
to become more personally involved and even a leader in economic
development I am concerned with the current council’s desire for the
city to stand on their own and do it all alone. I am even more concerned
with the manner and urgency in which the funding to EDA was pulled.
Forming strong partnerships and strengthening existing partnerships
is critical if the City is to be successful in economic development,
creating jobs and improving the lives of the residents of Port Huron. At
the same time, severing partnerships that are no longer “viable” or
that cannot be mended may also be necessary at times. It is very important
that when considering when to end a partnership we are certain it is not
now nor will it be “viable” in the future and that we do it in a
professional, respectful manner. |
|||||
| Mark Byrne |
"Not
only do I support the decision to stop having Port Huron taxpayers pay EDA
dues for a 3rd way in our 2009/2010 budget, I
proposed eliminating the EDA membership dues during discussions on the
2008/2009 budget as well.
Port Huron Taxpayers pay county, city, PHASD, Library, County Parks
and |
|||||
| Marty Doorn | "The decision to hire a city focused economic development director is in the best interest of the residents of Port Huron. With 26% unemployment, rising home foreclosures, declining population, increased poverty rates and a shrinking industrial park, the city must have a robust economic development program. It is painfully clear that the direction we were headed was not yielding the results needed to revitalize our city. The residents of Port Huron still make a significant contribution to the EDA through the county and other taxpayer supported organizations." | |||||
| James Fisher | Yes,
I support this action. Port Huron's unemployment rate is 26% and the
County's is 20%. Both are significantly higher than Michigan's 15% and the
Nation's 9%. It is clear that what we have been doing has not worked and
may have been moving us in the wrong direction. Losing our Industrial
Park's certification in 2005 is just one small example of why we need a
Port Huron focused economic development director. While I fully support
regionalization and combining resources, we need to choose our partners
carefully and be sure there is a benefit to the Port Huron citizen. I
reject the idea that Port Huron is now "going it alone." It
could be said that the service we were receiving from the EDA was
"going it alone." Getting our Industrial Park re-certified, we
will be able to partner with the MEDC and other organizations to assist in
the success of our Industrial Park. Not only is this move better for the
Port Huron taxpayer, it is probably better for all the surrounding
communities. |
|||||
| Ken Harris | No Response | |||||
| Alan Lewandowski | "Yes, I fully support the direction that city council has taken in its approach towards economic development. Michigan is on the verge of a new revitalized economy and Port Huron needs to make sure that it is positioned correctly to take advantage of opportunities that present themselves down the road. I believe that the hiring of a City Economic Development Director, who works exclusively for Port Huron’s interest, places the city on the best path to future economic success." | |||||
| Irene Michaels | No Response | |||||
| Steven Miller | No Response | |||||
| Brian Moeller | "Yes" | |||||
| Mark Neal | No Response | |||||
| Chad Noetzel | "I would have liked to see the whole dialog between city council and the EDA at the time. How many phone calls and meetings/workshops were held when council noticed a problem. It seemed like a very short time between the time the Times Herald got involved and the time council "fired" the EDA in my opinion. The EDA is still working for us and we are still paying them. Except now we are paying the EDA and Mr. Schiffano. I believe we are going to see a big change in how the EDA is viewed and how the city works with them in the near future. I think Pay for Performance is a good option to get back on track. The taxpayers are fed up with study after study and bigger government. And I personally think manufacturing is going to take a long time to get back to where it was, if it ever will. I don't want to wait that long, we need to make conscious decisions now to improve the lives of the Blue Water Area." | |||||
| Edison Palmer | "I
wholeheartedly approve and support the decision of City Council to go to
their own development director. Port Huron was receiving no return for
laying out hundreds of thousands of dollars over the years except to see
new high tech industry go else where in the county.
I also feel that recent media coverage of new business was an effort to slam this council's decision. These projects were in the works for months, not days, and it just goes to show how our city taxpayers money was spent to further St.Clair's industrial park." |
|||||
| Pauline Repp | "I
believe that it is of the utmost importance that the City of Port Huron
pursue economic opportunities. As far as whether the current City
Council made the right decision to "go it alone" will remain to
be seen. It is far too soon to analyze the results of this decision.
In all fairness, the only people who were privy to all the facts about
this decision was the current City Council and the EDA and for me to make
any judgment without knowing all that was involved would be irresponsible.
I would have liked to have seen more shared publicly and perhaps it could
have resulted in a more amicable resolution to the issue. |
|||||
| Domingo Ruiz | No Response | |||||
| During the pre-primary debate. A few of the challengers commented that too much time has been spent on "trivial matters." Specifically, over the past two years, what items up for council consideration have you considered "trivial?" Submitted by Jim Fisher 8-26-2009. | ||||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
"I
do not believe anyone indicated that any matters were “trivial
matters” but that a great deal of time was spent on some issues that
could have been decided on much quicker and very little time spent on
other issues that were much more critical to the future of the city.
Specifically, it took, or it certainly appears to the public that it took
less time to hire a new city manager, less time to turn down the small
business incubator project, less time to pull the funding from EDA, less
time to make changes to the McMorran Board and replace Larry Krabach, etc.
etc. than it took to decide on drinking in the park, the use of fire pits
in Port Huron and whether or not Johnny Dog, a veteran, could sell hotdogs
on Edison Parkway." |
|||||
| Mark Byrne |
"While there may have been small items
addressed I do not see how they took away from time spent on other issues.
For example council meetings that addressed an issue such as the
invocation would simply have ended earlier if no discussion on the
invocation policy had taken place. A recent council meeting took an hour. Had we taken
another hour to discuss any other topic it would have not taken time away
from other topics. I for one think all issues are important and should be addressed promptly when they arise. While some may think restoring Freedoms to citizens is trivial I consider both your and my Freedoms to be extremely important as Freedom and responsibility are the basis this great country was founded on." |
|||||
| Marty Doorn | "What may appear "trivial" to one person might be very important to another. The council must address concerns of all the residents, even those that might appear insignificant. The council is also required to address any number of "routine" matters that might appear trivial, but are a necessary part of the duties." | |||||
| James Fisher | Submitted question. | |||||
| Ken Harris | No Response | |||||
| Alan Lewandowski | "Port Huron has a large and diverse population, and every issue that is decided upon by the city council will have an effect on someone living in the city. I don’t believe that any of the issues that were discussed in my first-term on the Port Huron City Council would be considered trivial. | |||||
| Irene Michaels | No Response | |||||
| Steven Miller | No Response | |||||
| Brian Moeller | "What is trivial to some may not be trivial to others. As a representative of the people I must be cognizant of everyone's concerns." | |||||
| Mark Neal | No Response | |||||
| Chad Noetzel | "Jim, If you recall I was not one of those that was of that opinion. I'm not sure what a trivial issue is, because what may be trivial to some may be a life changing decision for someone else. You guys were in charge, you were elected to make decisions even if some did not think they were important or correct. Although I have to be honest, it seems a lot is getting done this summer. But I guess that will make it better for the city and that is always good even if it is "politics as usual". If I don't make it to council I still have to live here." | |||||
| Edison Palmer |
"I did not ask that at the forum. I do believe that some of the councils decisions were not really that important to making Port Huron better. One comes to mind is the Alcohol in the park ordinance. I feel that some areas are going to be fine for this, as people have always drank small amounts for family reunions or picnics, and never had a problem unless they became unruly or drunk and the police had to get involved. But making this ordinance really didn't make our parks any more used or contributed to our economy more by enacting it. By and Large most of the work done by the current council has been worthwhile except in some limited cases, I would agree to the decisions. I don't however agree with the manner in which the council treats people sometimes, as they seem uninterested and somewhat bullying at times, even making fun at others expense. Remember its not who you are but how you carry yourself, is how you will be remembered." |
|||||
| Pauline Repp | No Response | |||||
| Domingo Ruiz | No Response | |||||
|
The current city council drastically reduced the pay for the new city manager compared to the previous city manager, would you favor reducing the pay level for department heads and eliminating severance pay when they quit? Submitted by Chad Noetzel 8-12-2009. |
||||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
"While I am not in favor of reducing salaries for department heads
currently employed at the city, I do support re-evaluating the salary and
benefits for all positions when replacing outgoing staff. Not only would
it be unreasonable to expect, it would be financially irresponsible to pay
a new less experienced department head the same salary and benefits as an
outgoing tenured department head. New staff should be paid based on
education and experience within a pre-determined salary scale set by the
city manager and approved by the council. This scale should be based on
the pay rate of similar positions in cities similar to the size of Port
Huron, what the budget can afford and what would be reasonable in order to
obtain and keep quality staff." |
|||||
| Mark Byrne | "I am a leader on
this topic. I have shown salary comparison data and introduced resolutions
that passed. One reduced the Police Chief's salary to no more
than 7% higher than the Police captains from about 30% higher.
Reductions have all ready been implemented for the City Manager,
Police Chief and City Clerk as these vacated positions were filled.
Reducing the HR Directors salary is in process currently. We have
shown that very qualified people can be obtained at salaries lower than
what was being paid to department heads in each case. As our
citizens have been asked to tighten their belts in this economy so must the
city administration. These 4 salary reductions will save
taxpayers about $230,000 a year in salaries and benefits.
These
savings prevent the lay offs of Police Officers, Fire Fighters and others
who perform critical essential services that we must maintain if we are
start attracting people and jobs back to Port Huron. The alternative
chosen by previous city council members and city administrations was to
raise water and sewer rates making Port Huron a less attractive choice for
people and business's to locate. I am also
in favor of and pushing for changes in the work rules that allow a person to
accumulate sick and vacation days from the time they first start working for the
city when they are often in entry level jobs and then cash them out later at
their current often higher level pay 30 years later. This practice needs to stop
as it creates several problems: |
|||||
| Marty Doorn | "Many department heads have served the city for a long time
and as a result they are near the peak of their earning potential as city
employees. As they retire, manager Bruce Brown, in
partnership with the city council, is reducing the salary for those
positions." |
|||||
| James Fisher | "Due to their time of service to the city, many of our department heads are at the top of their pay scale. As department heads retire, the pay will obviously be less for the incoming person. I do not support cutting salaries of current department heads or of any city employee. As is true with all business and organizations, the salaries and job duties of replacement personnel needs to be evaluated and adjusted to be in line with modern needs and practices." | |||||
| Ken Harris | No Response | |||||
| Alan Lewandowski | "No,
I do not favor decreasing the pay level for the city’s department heads.
The council has looked at this issue during past budget workshops and have
been given reports by two different city managers that have shown that our
department head salaries are not out of line with cities similar in size.
Also, most of the department heads have not been awarded a raise in their
salary in over three years. Many
of the city department heads also manage more than one city department. By
taking on the extra responsibilities,
they are saving the city thousands of dollars in salaries that are not
being paid for a person to run a department. Lastly,
I believe that most of the city’s department heads, with their education
levels and work experience, could make much more in the private sector.
These are for the most part, the same employee that during the mid to late
1990’s and in the early part of this decade who did not complain that
their salaries were not keeping pace with the private sector." |
|||||
| Irene Michaels | No Response | |||||
| Steven Miller | No Response | |||||
| Brian Moeller |
"The previous
City Managers Salary and benefit package was $244,000 in a City where the
average family earns $32,000 a year. Per capita our City Manager was
the highest paid City Manager in the State of Michigan per the Michigan
Municipal League. Leaving out the issue of population our City
Manager was the fifth highest paid in the State. The only cities
that paid their City Manager more were Ann Arbor, West Bloomfield, East
Lansing and I believe Troy. I can be honest an say as much as I love
Port Huron we are not in the same economic class as those cities.
(The $244,000 package was worked on by one of the candidates listed here) When we hired Mr. Brown his
salary and benefit package was worked on by myself and Mayor Pro Tem
Fisher and Mr. Brown was given the average package of cities in the State
with populations of between 25,000 and 40,000. As to the Department Heads
I have lead the charge as Mayor with the rest of this Council to reduce
pay, or to keep it at the level of cities with similiar populations.
I also have lead the charge to do away with double pensions.
For instance a Department Head leaving the City with 25 years of service
and making $90,000 a year would receive a pension of approximately $56,250
per year for the rest of there life and in the second pension a 457 (which
is like a 401K), if they had the lowest match of only 3%, they would have
an additional $67,500 put into their 457 over the 25 year period by the
tax payers of Port Huron, while we continue to raise the tax payers water
rates who make $32,000 a year. As to getting a servance
package for quitting, give me a break, I have never heard of such a thing
and was proud along with my other council members running for re-election
to do away with such packages." |
|||||
| Mark Neal | No Response | |||||
| Chad Noetzel | "I would never ever raise taxes. City government needs to reduce the budget to a bare working minimum. Even in good times. City officials and dept. Heads are the servents not the masters. The citizens are the masters. They should not get more than anyone in the private sector, especially when they retire. I would honor the current contracts that are in place." | |||||
| Edison Palmer | "I
am in favor of re-evaluating all departments budgets which includes
supervisors and department heads salary and benefits. I do not believe
that in a city where unemployment is at such an incredibly high number,
people who make a living off of the tax payers should receive unacceptable
high pay and benefits.
This does not go to say that I feel that employees don't deserve good pay for good work. But governmental employees should understand that when private sector jobs are in the toilet, they can not continue to live as if the economy was skyrocketing. As a personal note, the employer that I work for has already told us that we will not get a pay raise for next year and we will pay more for our benefit package. We also will lose one vacation day. This is mirrored all over the private sector, while government has not kept pace. Lets remember that government is payed for by tax payers, and should reflect that." |
|||||
| Pauline Repp | "Our objective should be to have quality department heads serving the citizens of Port Huron. To do this, we need to be competitive with other similar communities. Reviewing compensation for department heads for appropriateness in the market place is certainly prudent when the positions are being vacated" | |||||
| Domingo Ruiz | No Response | |||||
| 1. What strategy should the city employ for economic development? (Times Herald Primary Election Question) | ||||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
"To be successful and sustain economic
development it is imperative for the city to be innovative, capitalize on
existing assets and develop
partnerships wherever possible. Everyone is a potential partner from
developers, foundations, government, colleges, businesses and
organizations to neighboring cities and even Sarnia. Education is also key
to economic development. Higher education improves the employability of
our work force and helps attract new employers and students to the area.
We must expand educational opportunities, strengthen existing partnerships
and form new ones. To be successful, we must work together for the greater
good of all, the city and the surrounding areas." |
|||||
| Mark Byrne | "Reduce the regulatory and tax burdens placed
on those who choose to do business or live in Port Huron. Businesses and
citizens are paying customers and should be treated as such. I would not
shop at a store that charges higher prices and only allows me to look at
an item if they are standing over me to verify I'm looking at the item
correctly. Likewise, businesses and homeowners will not locate in Port
Huron if we have higher taxes and more regulations
than other communities. Suspending permit fees and requirements for a
month will demonstrate freedom works." |
|||||
| Marty Doorn | "The city manager, in partnership with the
City Council, is well into the process of rolling out a city focused
economic development plan. The plan includes identifying both people and
organizations that can best serve the city's economic development
interests. It also includes requiring those responsible for economic
development to present detailed plans and provide monthly updates to the
city manager and quarterly reports to the City Council. While it is
important to shore up our manufacturing and small business base,
considerable emphasis is being placed on commercial development, with a
focus on strategic waterfront properties." |
|||||
| James Fisher | "I believe we are now on the right track for
creating favorable conditions for economic development. We have chosen an
economic development person to ensure our industrial park is utilized to
its fullest capacity. We have outlined a commercial development plan to
provide for development in our commercial and retail areas. In addition,
this council has strived to keep water and sewer bills as low as possible
to encourage people to live in Port Huron." |
|||||
| Ken Harris | "The city must diversify economic development
to fit the state's agenda, which includes but is not limited to, the film
industry and green policies." |
|||||
| Alan Lewandowski | "Port Huron needs to adopt an economic
development strategy of personalized recruitment and retention. Port Huron
has all the economic tools at its disposal that other communities can
offer, but what has been missing is a highly qualified individual that is
out fighting for Port Huron's economic success exclusively. Port Huron is
centrally located in the North American marketplace and offers many
features that other communities can not offer such as an international
rail tunnel, a strong labor force, an international bridge crossing and
low cost/high quality buildings. I have worked to help put some of
the needed pieces in place and am committed to solving the current
economic problems of Port Huron." |
|||||
| Irene Michaels | "A series of meetings with the collaboration
of this community without people feeling threatened and for embracing the
camaraderie that will make this city shine. The meaning of series is: A
number of things produced as a related group set." |
|||||
| Steven Miller | "The city needs to address the economic
situation in a comprehensive manner. We need to address our own needs with
the use of the newly hired executive director of industrial development.
We need to promote our access to transportation and the international
border. The new Blue Water Bridge Plaza will afford us additional
marketing opportunities that we need to build on and promote. We also need
to work with the various governmental entities and organizations in the
surrounding area for the common good and job creation. The main advantage
we have is the water. This should be the marketing strategy." |
|||||
| Brian Moeller |
"The
current economic plan developed by the City Council by a unanimous vote
with the concurring city manager is probably the first and most complete
economic plan ever developed by a City Council, at least in recent years. |
|||||
| Mark Neal | "In these tough economic times, I think local
and county government needs to work together as a region to attract new
job opportunities to our area. Selfishly, you would like to have any new
opportunities locate in the city of Port Huron. However, realistically,
will that happen every time? No. Our focus needs to be to get potential
employers to our area so our residents will have the ability to live and
work in their immediate area." |
|||||
| Chad Noetzel | "I would like to see Port Huron focus on
becoming more of a tourist destination spot. First and foremost, we need
to get downtown and our waterfront properties developed for commercial
use. Port Huron has all the amenities that a vacationer is looking for. We
have the most beautiful waterfront on the Great Lakes. We have two
interstates, an international border crossing, marina facilities and
usually great weather five to six months a year. I think the casino could
still be an option. We need to get the talented people of Port Huron
together to figure it out." |
|||||
| Edison Palmer | "Each City Council member should personally
and with our new development officer for Port Huron, seek out new high
tech green industries and bio tech firms. We could partner with SC4 and
our regional universities to establish Port Huron as a magnet for these
new, growing industries. With our great infrastructure and resources here,
including a sewage and water treatment plant that has the know-how on
dealing with industrial waste water, public safety departments specially
trained in handling hazardous materials situations, our location on the
water and our access to major highways that lead to Canada and Mexico, we
are superbly set up for bringing these business here." |
|||||
| Pauline Repp | "It is important that the city be part of a
regional partnership for economic development, one that is beneficial to
everyone. A joint effort in the recruitment of diversified business
opportunities as well as making sure we have a skilled and trained work
force is crucial. I believe the expansion and reconstruction of the Blue
Water Bridge Plaza will open up opportunities that will improve the local
economy. The city needs to take advantage of this project by playing a
major part in the process with continued cooperation with the county and
surrounding jurisdictions." |
|||||
| Domingo Ruiz | "It is my belief that the city needs to
communicate with all potential groups, organizations and individuals who
could assist with economic development. This includes those already in
place, those who assisted in the past and new advisrrs if they are
available." |
|||||
| 2.
What should be done
to pay the debt from the sewer separation project? |
||||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
"It's unfortunate Port Huron is faced with
such a monumental debt and the task of deciding how to pay it off. As
residents, we must be concerned where the money will come from to tackle
the debt without raising rates or taxes, but we must face the
inevitable: The debt must be repaid. Every effort should be made to keep
rates where they are, however, we need to start addressing the debt, not
keep pushing it into the future. Further budget cuts, grants and new
sources of revenue need to be explored to start paying the debt and
prevent future increases." |
|||||
| Mark Byrne | "Reversing
declining population and business base is the way to ensure revenue is
maintained or increased without raising taxes. Over the life of this debt
service, cost cuts will add up. Selling the marina and city-owned land
shifted $8 million in costs to $1 million in revenue. Eliminating double
pensions and severance for quitting reduced costs by another $2 million.
Changing work rules so that vacation and sick days must be used up each
year or lost instead of accumulated and cashed out at higher pay rates
inflating pension benefits, also will save additional millions over the
debt payoff period." |
|||||
| Marty Doorn | "With
an unemployment rate approaching 25%, shrinking payrolls and declining
population, I will not vote to raise taxes or increase water rates on the
beleaguered citizens of Port Huron. We are facing the worst economic
crisis since the (Great Depression). The city will find it necessary to
cover the sewer separation obligation through a combination of improved
efficiencies in the cost of government and an increase in economic
development. Even as the economic crisis eases, I support keeping taxes
and water rates low to encourage growth and development." |
|||||
| James Fisher | "Past water and sewer rate increases have
generated the necessary stream of money to pay off this debt. The city has
nearly $60 million in various bank accounts that should be used to reduce
the financial burden on our citizens. To advocate any increase in rates
will cause even more economic distress to our city. In other words, it's
not the city that is in danger of being bankrupted by the (combined sewer
overflows) project, it's the average Port Huron resident that faces the
danger of being bankrupted by the eye-popping increases proposed by the
former council and administration." |
|||||
| Ken Harris | "This a question that should have had an
answer before the project began. Could this be folded into one bond issue for sewer
separation that did not include the additional cost of water mains and
services, thus limiting the cost of the state mandate?" |
|||||
| Alan Lewandowski | "There is no question that the (combined sewer
overflow) project has been a large financial burden on the residents of
Port Huron. The general fund of the city budget has
been cut and will continue to be cut. But, at some point in the near
future cutting money from the budget to make up for the looming cost of
the CSO project will not be possible without interrupting essential
services. The council and city administration need to look at raising the
water/sewer rates in small amounts to avoid having to raise the rates in
large sums in the future. The city cannot continue to subsidize the
water/sewer departments at $5 million a year and expect to pay its bills
on cuts alone." |
|||||
| Irene Michaels | "We
need to look at all strategies and ideas from the people of this community
and from the business groups of this community to come up with a fair and
honest solution." |
|||||
| Steven Miller | "The city needs to utilize federal stimulus
money, as much as possible, to pay for the (combined sewer overflow) work.
There will be a number of stimulus resources that will offset some of the
cost. MDOT also will be picking up the bill for some additional work that
will be done. We can use the street money voters previously approved to
pay for part of the project and the CSO bill. What is not covered will
need to be financed by low-interest loans. There is no doubt that we need
to find every available resource to pay this enormous bill." |
|||||
| Brian Moeller |
"Continue
fiscal responsibility to make appropriate cuts in the budget. In the
current economic times, it only would be disastrous to raise water rates
for city residents and those in surrounding townships. Unlike the Times
Herald Editorial Board, which praised council members who voted to raise
water rates, I saw those votes as ways to make it possible for salary
increases for employees. I voted not to give raises, which is a
responsible way of paying for the sewer separation project. |
|||||
| Mark Neal |
"I do not know the balance in the water and
sewer fund currently. However, I will be fiscally responsible to the
citizens of Port Huron in meeting the terms of our debt obligations and
will adhere to the director's order issued by the Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality." |
|||||
| Chad Noetzel | "I don't think raising taxes or rates is ever
an option. That is the easy way out for government. We should be looking
for ways to cut our spending and slim down city government. But, I believe
we need to increase our customer base. We have to make it more affordable
for people and businesses to live and work in Port Huron. We should lower
taxes and attract quality customers. But we really have to get our
government to operate on a small budget so we can spend money where it
needs to be spent." |
|||||
| Edison Palmer | "By encouraging industrial and residential
growth that would cause our systems to be used more. If that cannot be
accomplished, then budget cuts and reductions will have to be made. In a
city that includes an awful lot of working families, unemployed people and
seniors on fixed incomes, residents cannot afford the former council's
proposed increases. Until the city gets back on its feet, we cannot expect
our residents to use their mortgage and food money to have a basic right
of water." |
|||||
| Pauline Repp | "This project has been a huge burden on our
taxpayers. To date, the city has been fortunate to have received grants
and loans, and stimulus money has been earmarked for this project.
Combined, all of these have helped lessen the burden, but it is imperative
that the city be fiscally responsible by making sure enough money is
available to pay off the mounting debt. During these difficult economic
times, spending needs to be at a minimum and new sources of revenue looked
into; however, city services necessary for the public health and welfare
of our citizens should not be eliminated." |
|||||
| Domingo Ruiz | "It
is important for the city to maintain a high level of fiscal
responsibility. Every effort must be made to review the annual budget to
ensure it meets the needs of the citizens and stays within the limits
allowed by revenue. At the same time, there will be difficult decisions
that will have to be made. All along this period of time, the citizens of
Port Huron need to be kept informed and allowed to have input in decision
making." |
|||||
| 3. After economic development, what is the biggest issue facing the city? (Times Herald Primary Election Question) | ||||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
"Rising
unemployment and the lack of living-wage jobs is by far the biggest issue
facing the city. Next to that, there are several issues: education,
tourism and the fact we are an aging city. Like many older cities, many of
our homes and buildings are decaying. Commercial buildings are no longer
cost efficient to operate. Vacant, blighted properties are detracting from
our neighborhoods, industrial park and downtown. We need to continue the
community development efforts city staff and others have started, seek
additional revenue to further address these issues and make the city
attractive to new businesses and residents." |
|||||
| Mark Byrne | "A
big issue facing Port Huron is that our next generation is leaving the
area in search of career opportunities. We must start creating an
environment in Port Huron that attracts entrepreneurs to start, relocate
or expand their business here. Reducing regulatory and tax burdens is the
best way to attract them. There are many growing industries, including
technology and renewable energy. In addition, having large companies open
branches in Port Huron provides career opportunities. Stafford, Texas, has
been extremely successful at this, and we should learn from the strategy
they used. See www.cityofstafford.com for details." |
|||||
| Marty Doorn | "Nearly
every issue facing the city has budget or economic development
implications. My wish list of issues and opportunities includes reversing
the trend of a declining city population, developing a convention center,
revitalization of the Thomas Edison Inn, maximizing opportunities that
arise from the (Blue Water Bridge Plaza) construction, reforming
government, in part, through continued cooperation with the county, and
approving a city charter that is geared for a 21st century city. The good
news, is that the city manager and the City Council are working in
partnership on each of these issues." |
|||||
| James Fisher | "For
many years, citizens have felt that our city government existed to do
things to them rather than for them. City government should represent the
people, and citizens should not be living in fear of what new rate
increase or tax increase is around the corner. I will continue to strive
for complete openness and honesty from the city administration. I will do
my best to be sure that every dollar of taxpayer money is intelligently
spent and be sure that the city works for the benefit of the people, not
that people are working for the benefit of city hall." |
|||||
| Ken Harris | "The
exodus of many middle income wage earners and recent influx of
nonresidents who have no expectations of income. Many city employees,
contractors and agents do not reside in Port Huron. We reward downtown
entrepreneurs; we must reward those who sell Port Huron as a haven for
middle-class wage earners." |
|||||
| Alan Lewandowski | "Aside
from budget concerns and economic development, I think the biggest issue
we face as a community is changing the attitude of the people in the city.
When the citizens believe the leaders of the city are working in their
best interest and start seeing progress in the city, they will support the
local leadership in its endeavors. There has been lots of bad news for the
residents of the city as of late and some positive news will come as a
welcome breath of fresh air. There is light at the end of the tunnel for
Port Huron, it is just going to take some hard work and some creative
thinking to reach that point. If the next council, private developers,
private donors and private entrepreneurs all work toward the
same goal of improving the city, Port Huron can become everything it
should be and possibly more." |
|||||
| Irene Michaels | "Becoming
united with each other with no strings attached because as the people
become united greater things are yet to come to this city and greater
things are still yet to be done in this city. Let's become one and it can
be accomplished. The meaning of accomplish is: To succeed in doing;
completed; skill; proficient." |
|||||
| Steven Miller | "The
biggest issue facing the city is its financial health. The decline of
revenue, jobs, residency and the lack of opportunities for prosperity is
causing residents and our young people to leave. I have two daughters who
make their homes outside of the Port Huron area due, in part, to the lack
of viable employment. I believe we must address this more than any other
issue. This will require marketing this area and its strengths to create a
job base for a young and vibrant community. Growth promotes more growth.
The strongest marketing points are the college, the waterways, Acheson
Ventures and access to international transportation." |
|||||
| Brian Moeller |
"Unity:
too many bosses and not enough worker bees. We, as a council, have been
working on this and will continue to work on this issue by having key
groups and persons lead the charge for the city and report to the council
quarterly to keep the council informed. Examples: The DDA being the group
leading in the business area downtown and the chamber in the rest of the
city. Blue Water Area Convention and Visitors Bureau in attracting
tourists and Main Street in leading the charge for events in the city. We need to have all groups working together for the betterment of the city and have members of the City Council be the leaders they were elected to be, not just a group of observers on the sideline." |
|||||
| Mark Neal |
"The
implementation of the Blue Water Bridge Plaza expansion project is in the
middle of our primary north/south traffic corridor. The city must work
with MDOT to make sure our inconvenience is kept to a minimum. In
addition, the city needs to work with MDOT to make this project an asset
to our community and not a liability." |
|||||
| Chad Noetzel | "One
of the problems in the area is the lack of activities for our kids and
young adults. I would like to see more local people using our parks and
beaches. I can't figure out why we don't have lifeguards at our public
beaches. One other issue is that we need to communicate and cooperate with
the township and surrounding cities to possibly regionalize some of our
public services. If Port Huron is vibrant, the whole
county will prosper." |
|||||
| Edison Palmer | "The
amount of rental housing in Port Huron is way too high. I am not against
renters. I believe that our residents that rent their housing are very
important to Port Huron. They work here, shop here and pay taxes here.
But, I know quite a few who have lost their houses to foreclosure and
would like to be homeowners again. By encouraging new tech-based
industries to settle in Port Huron, I believe we can get a
"neighborhood feel" again. It's a fact that higher home
ownership in a city decreases crime and makes for less apathy toward one
another." |
|||||
| Pauline Repp | "Cooperation
amongst surrounding jurisdictions and community partners seems to be at a
low. I believe that in order for the city to move forward and prosper
there needs to be a united effort to work on joint projects and to share
services where possible. A regional group should be formed with
representatives from the city, the county and surrounding jurisdictions as
well as other interested participants. I also believe that the city itself
needs to have a united vision of what it wants to be and then work on
achieving that goal. Citizen involvement is imperative." |
|||||
| Domingo Ruiz | "Most
of my concerns center on the two issues listed in this question. In
addition, there is the concern that city leaders communicate in a civil
and responsible manner at all times. As leaders, they set the example for
the community and set the tone for moving forward to meet all challenges.
Negativity can set us back and potentially cause us to lose the support of
important individuals and resources." |
|||||
| Darrin Rushing | "With
the overall deterioration of downtown Port Huron, the city seems to have
lost its "identity." While we still have signature events like
Silver Stick and the Port Huron-to-Mackinac Island boat race, the city no
longer has an image or reputation of being a family friendly place. I
think more efforts are needed to bring more family friendly events to the
downtown area on a more consistent and year-round basis. Also, I believe
that each community within Port Huron should become more involved with
their own neighborhoods. When you know your neighbors, you are more
inclined to care about them and your neighborhood." |
|||||
| 4. What would you do with McMorran Place if you had the final say? (Times Herald Primary Election Question) | ||||||
|
Anthony America |
"McMorran is a jewel in our treasure chest and must be kept up and in operating condition. This depression can't last forever, and when we rebound, McMorran will be one of our mainstays and revenue makers. Also, let's not lose the opportunity of the (Fort Gratiot Lighthouse), it can be another beautiful city asset, and all the buildings are history -- that can be one more tourist destination." |
|||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
"There is more to the decision regarding McMorran than having the final say. The decision is tied entirely to adequate funding. Funding aside, I would make it a state-of-the-art arena and entertainment center. The Silver Stick hockey tournament is an example of the kind of events that could be hosted at a state-of-the-art facility bringing in revenue. A decision must be made to move forward and a very aggressive plan put into place. A new board and general manager were appointed, guide them and give them time to accomplish what they were appointed to do." |
|||||
| Mark Byrne | "McMorran was a great gift and was once an economic engine for downtown. As a Libertarian, I believe government has no business being in the entertainment industry. Selling McMorran or leasing it to a private company will eliminate the city's $300,000 a year subsidy, result in the facility being better utilized, draw more people downtown and generate more tax revenue along with more jobs at the facility. River Street Marina, for example, once placed in control of a private sector company, went from being a money pit to money maker, despite high gas prices and a very rough economy." | |||||
| Marty Doorn | "The current City Council has reorganized the McMorran Authority and put in place a new leadership team. The new authority has been given 36 months to create a long-term management plan and to explore ways to fund the required infrastructure improvements. It is essential that this new leadership team be given an opportunity to complete their work. Already, the new leadership team has instituted reforms that have brought us closer to a balanced budget, with a goal of ending the operating subsidy, provided by the city, within the next 24 months." | |||||
| James Fisher | "I have continually said that McMorran would be well served by a private management company. Bringing a profit motive to McMorran Place will insure that the taxpayer subsidy will be reduced or eliminated. McMorran is a vital component to our community and it needs to be used and marketed to its fullest potential. I believe private management is our best option to achieve this goal." | |||||
| Ken Harris | "McMorran's subsidy must be reduced to the cost of providing water and sewage service. The new authority has several members who have the initiatives it takes to make changes. Users must accept change as a way to do business. If this three-year experiment fails, we need to part from McMorran as decreed at recent roundtables." | |||||
| Alan Lewandowski | "I am afraid that there are only two real viable options for McMorran's future, in my opinion. The first is creating a regional authority to run McMorran. The second is trying to privatize McMorran again. As the councilman who introduced the resolution to privatize McMorran the first time, I still believe that privatization is the best option for the future success of McMorran. Government does many things well for its citizens, but providing entertainment is not an area in which government excels. If I had the final say on what happens with McMorran, I would be doing everything I could to get Kinney Management interested in running McMorran again." | |||||
| Irene Michaels | "Restore McMorran as a historical legacy along with the many uses that can bring profit and sustain it. This building was erected in 1959. That's 50 years in the community, and it should continue to be a service to this community with the help of the people of this community, to bring these ideas to the City Council and keep the legacy that McMorran was built for." | |||||
| Steven Miller | "The one thing that cannot happen is closing McMorran. Should McMorran close, it would lead to urban decline and blight downtown. Even though this is a recurring cost at this time to the city, the alternative is much worst. It was a gift given to us, and we need to make sure it remains viable. The most appealing idea is to expand the use of the facility. This, in itself, would generate money and stimulate downtown business. This would create an interest in downtown restaurants and businesses. The other idea would be a partnership with the county or private management group." | |||||
| Brian Moeller | "I believe that we are going in the right direction with the new (McMorran) Authority, by cutting the subsidy $80,000 this year and by having the DDA give the authority $100,000. With these successes, we will continue to cut the subsidy and hopefully have a stand-alone, thriving convention center whether it continues to be run by the city, an authority of surrounding communities or by a private enterprise." | |||||
| Mark Neal | "I would request proposals to have a private management company run the facility. Upon receiving those proposals, I would compare them with how the current management is performing. McMorran Place is a tremendous asset to our downtown and the Blue Water Area. We must look at all options and choose the best one that would maximize the use at the least cost to the city." | |||||
| Chad Noetzel | "I would like to give the current management and board a chance to make McMorran profitable. But the taxpayers of Port Huron should no longer be the only ones paying to subsidize it. Port Huron citizens make up a small percentage of the users of the facility. We need to have a regional authority and have McMorran supported by a countywide millage. It would not take much to support it. If we put that to a vote and it doesn't pass, we should mothball McMorran and wait for a buyer to take it over." | |||||
| Edison Palmer | "I think McMorran should be run by a private/public partnership, maybe SC4. They could use the facilities for their basketball and volleyball games, as could Port Huron High School vs. Port Huron Northern High School -- that would be a lot of fun. But I really believe that proper use is dictated by profit with some nonprofit community-based use would run the facility better. I don't think with decreasing city income and unemployment, the taxpayer can continue to subsidize McMorran much longer." | |||||
| Pauline Repp | "McMorran was a wonderful gift to the city but one that did not include money for its future. At present, only the citizens of Port Huron are financially responsible for its upkeep yet this facility is enjoyed by many nonresidents. Ways of making the facility operate with less of a deficit as well as ways to share its financial burden and governance with others should be explored. McMorran is a major player in the success of downtown Port Huron and all options for its continued operation should be reviewed. Closing its doors would be a last resort." | |||||
| Domingo Ruiz | "McMorran Place is still a work in progress and all options for its use should be examined. It is my intent to study what the situation is at the present time before making any comment on future decisions. It is important that the decision made takes into consideration the financial impact on taxpayers and recognize McMorran's value as a community center." | |||||
|
Sherry Archibald |
||||||
| Mark Byrne | ||||||
| Marty Doorn | ||||||
| James Fisher | ||||||
| Ken Harris | ||||||
| Alan Lewandowski | ||||||
| Irene Michaels | ||||||
| Steven Miller | ||||||
| Brian Moeller | ||||||
| Mark Neal | ||||||
| Chad Noetzel | ||||||
| Edison Palmer | ||||||
| Pauline Repp | ||||||
| Domingo Ruiz | ||||||